Product Review: CALIFORNIA BABY Super Sensitive Hair Conditioner
My baby was born bald, and she remained peach-fuzzy for at least her first 12 months. Now at 22 months, she has the greatest hair-do. Super long blond hair in the back with gentle curls that spring when she dances around the house. Did I mention long….in the back. Yep, we call it the “baby girl mullet.” And it is the most beautiful mullet in all of time.
Her hair is fine and silky. It is so soft! That is, on a good day. Does this happen to your baby too? A perfect hair day gone bad as soon as she gets out of the car seat, crib, or stroller? From silk to bird’s nest in just one car ride!
Well, I was so happy to have found California Baby Super Sensitive Hair Conditioner . This delicately creamy conditioner magically turns a bird’s nest back into a silky-good-hair-day.
If you can relate, and are looking for a safe and non-toxic baby hair conditioner , keep reading.
Why We Love California Baby Conditioner
- This no-tears solution is 100% botanically based AND
- is biodegradable.
- Can be doubled as a body cleanser too.
- No parabens,
- no fragrances,
- and clear of chemicals makes this conditioner a favorite in our home.
Chemical-free Hair Detangler
Another feature that I must rave about here is that you can rinse out the conditioner, OR leave it in. Brilliant! So when baby has had enough of the bath-time rinse cycle, do everyone a favor and LEAVE IT IN. I also use it during the day to tame-the-do when necessary. Voila, good hair day!
California Baby Super Sensitive Hair Conditioner is a safe alternative to chemical ridden baby soaps and conditioners. A 8.5 oz bottle of happy-hair goodness sells for $9.95 at Amazon.com
Technorati Tags: California Baby Super Sensitive Hair Conditioner, safe and non-toxic baby hair conditioner
Category: Product Reviews, Skin Care
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
California Baby uses nanoparticles in their baby care. Please consider retracting your support for their line. Many of us who are involved in the organics industry are actively petitioning to include nanoparticles on the list of ingredients that may not be used in any USDA NOP certified organic product (along with the restrictions against the use of GMOs, irradiation and sludge.) Nanoparticles were originally developed for use as transdermal pharmacological delivery systems for situations in which oral or injectable treatments were ineffective or laden with side-effects. The cosmetics industry has hijacked the methodology of producing nanoparticles and these ingredients are now widely, and increasingly, used in skin care. It is impossible to find physical sun block that is nano-free (companies use nano zinc oxide and titanium dioxide that is nanoparticle size, do avoid the whitening that accompanies large particle mineral block.) And, most baby bottom balms use nanoparticle zinc. The size of the minerals used in baby and sun care is usually 7-15 nanos wide, well within the under 20 range that allows the particles to cross the blood-brain barrier. Again, please do your own research, and please take this issue very seriously. Thank you for your good work.
Nancy
In light of this, what sunscreen do you think is the ‘best’ in terms of safety for a baby? I have been researching and thought that physical sunblocks were better than chemical ones. I was deciding upon Soleo and California Baby. I was trying to find more information about nanoparticles when I stumbled upon this information. Thanks for any additional information that anybody can provide.
Dear Chris
We did a review on the Soleo USA sunscreen and we highly recommend it. Here is our review: http://www.safbaby.com/organic-chemical-free-sunscreen-that-youll-use-year-round